View Full Version : Carter Calls Cheney a Disaster
sandy
10-11-2007, 06:31 AM
This one literally made me LOL. :rolleyes: The worst POTUS in history is calling a brilliant man a disaster. :confused: The first real terrorist-enabler is saying Cheney is bad? :(
If he's not aiding and abetting our enemies, he's mocking our leaders. How DARE he insult Bush too--especially after the bang-up job he did as POTUS. Not.
Carter needs to just shut the hell up, go back to GA, and crawl back under his rock. No one cares about what he has to say.
He made a mockery of the White House by caving in to terrorists in '79. We haven't forgotten.
I don't care if he is a nice Christian man. He is an embarrassment to the USA.
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1026419120071010?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&rpc=22&sp=true
TaylorHicksRocks
10-11-2007, 08:54 AM
Well Cheney is a Disaster and will go down in History along with Dumbya' as the worrst prezident and vice prezident in history!!!!
Carter gave us the Ayatollah's in Iran and 444 days of US hostages. He also gave us the days of 20% inflation and 20% interest. Carter is one of the worst presidents we've ever had. Though W hasn't executed this war very well.
sandy
10-11-2007, 10:33 AM
I think Carter is the all-time worst. I admire W for his b@lls with this whole evil muslime terror problem. He doesn't care about ratings, he's trying to keep us ALIVE!
If W was POTUS in '79 the hostages would have been freed fast, the muslimes nuked, and Iran just a bad memory. :boldred:
When I see Carter I get a nauseated feeling in the pit of my stomach. He should shut up and move to Iran. They'd love him there. He has never met a dicatator he didn't embrace. :mad:
TaylorHicksRocks
10-11-2007, 10:35 AM
Carter gave us the Ayatollah's in Iran and 444 days of US hostages. He also gave us the days of 20% inflation and 20% interest. Carter is one of the worst presidents we've ever had. Though W hasn't executed this war very well.
No he hasn't and he is the worst prezident imo...I know Carter made a few mistakes but nothing compared to what Dumbya' has done and Carter did get the hostages back without going to war...
Carter pushed to cut a lot of money out of the Defense budget. He succeeded in cutting out a lot of money for maintenance and repairs on military equipment. Then when the rescue attempt was launched the task force had to make an emergency landing in the desert. Why? Lack of PM on the C-130's and helo's. Carter was a total joke of a POTUS and was only elected due to the aftertaste of Watergate.
W hasn't managed the war or secured the borders well at all. I don't rate him highly, but he's still better than "Grinnin' Jim".
TaylorHicksRocks
10-11-2007, 10:53 AM
Carter pushed to cut a lot of money out of the Defense budget. He succeeded in cutting out a lot of money for maintenance and repairs on military equipment. Then when the rescue attempt was launched the task force had to make an emergency landing in the desert. Why? Lack of PM on the C-130's and helo's. Carter was a total joke of a POTUS and was only elected due to the aftertaste of Watergate.
W hasn't managed the war or secured the borders well at all. I don't rate him highly, but he's still better than "Grinnin' Jim".
I don't like what he has done with the borders or how he handled himself after 9/11 after all he should have gone after OBL instead of finishing his daddy's war....That being said I am happy that SH is gone but our troops are still there and it is only bringing more of those that hate this country an excuse to kill more of our soldiers.....
sandy
10-11-2007, 10:57 AM
The main problem with the war is we had NO IDEA how many evil muslime terrorists would come over from Iran, Syria, etc.. We couldn't possibly know. Evil muslime terrorists don't exactly participate in census reports.;)
Everytime W tries to implement border control, the libs shoot it down. They whine it's discriminating etc. :mad: Liberals fight the MinuteMen, National Guard, and EVERYONE else helping at the border. And now their SanFran puke judge is stopping criminal alien firings and allowing hirings. Libs are scum. :mad:
I agree W has been less than stellar on immigration but he can't win with this one. I support arresting/deporting all criminal aliens, locking the border, line it with landmines/alligators/sharp-shooters, build the fence, and shoot-to-kill on site anyone even remotely suspected of being a criminal alien there.
Enough is enough. :(
W isn't great, but at least he has done a few good things (some tax cuts, taking out the Taliban, getting rid of Saddam). But he's poorly executed the war and failed to secure the borders. OTOH, Carter did nothing that redeemed his presidency.
kelly
10-11-2007, 11:15 AM
Carter did get the hostages back without going to war... The hostages were freed after Carter officially left. I disagree with THR. Carter had very little in the hostage return.
President elect Reagan promised Iran military action was headed their way as soon as he was in the Oval Office. Iran believed Reagan, and released the hostages. Iran new Jimmy possessed no backbone.
sandy
10-11-2007, 11:25 AM
Liberals have NEVER met a fight they didn't run from unless it involves being a criminal. Then it's all theirs. They FILL the jails. :(
Republicans are the only ones with any b@lls to fight evil muslimes/terrorists. Liberals applaud terrorists. :mad:
"Now our forces are killing lots of al-Qaida jihadists, preventing another terrorist attack on U.S. soil, and giving democracy in Iraq a chance -- and Democrats say we are "losing" this war. I think that's a direct quote from their leader in the Senate, Harry Reid, but it may have been the Osama bin Laden tape released this week. I always get those two confused." -AC
W isn't great, but at least he has done a few good things (some tax cuts, taking out the Taliban, getting rid of Saddam). But he's poorly executed the war and failed to secure the borders. OTOH, Carter did nothing that redeemed his presidency.
Bush didn't consider any factors. If the war had been planned at all, we would not still be there today, with Amercian soldiers being killed or serioulsy injured every day.
sandy
10-11-2007, 12:22 PM
False. Bush considered ALL factors. ALL. For a VERY long time.
The war was well-planned but never did we figure on all the evil muslimes from Iran, Syria, etc.:(
Criminal aliens kill more Americans than the war. Where is your outrage at them? :confused:
We are fighting a war on evil muslime terror. Better in Iraq than here.
Bush didn't consider any factors. If the war had been planned at all, we would not still be there today, with Amercian soldiers being killed or serioulsy injured every day.
They did 'consider'. Just it wasn't thought through to the conclusion. The military phase went well. But they didn't have a plan to manage the situation once they had defeated the Iraqi military and toppled Saddam.
I think we agree that in total, it hasn't been executed well.
False. Bush considered ALL factors. ALL. For a VERY long time.
The war was well-planned but never did we figure on all the evil muslimes from Iran, Syria, etc.:(
Criminal aliens kill more Americans than the war. Where is your outrage at them? :confused:
We are fighting a war on evil muslime terror. Better in Iraq than here.
Upset religious fanatics should have been one of the factors to be considered. The closeness in area to all those muslim countries should have been analyzed and their allegiance to islam and the fact that they will kill for their religion should have carefully considered and weighed.
I think the war has given the muslims leaders more fuel to get their followers to kill for them.
TaylorHicksRocks
10-11-2007, 12:58 PM
Upset religious fanatics should have been one of the factors to be considered. The closeness in area to all those muslim countries should have been analyzed and their allegiance to islam and the fact that they will kill for their religion should have carefully considered and weighed.
I think the war has given the muslims leaders more fuel to get their followers to kill for them.
Very well said K....Dumbya' should have taken into account where he planned on waging war and once they had killed SH he should have pulled the forces out that was the whole reason he wanted to go there to begin with.....
Very well said K....Dumbya' should have taken into account where he planned on waging war and once they had killed SH he should have pulled the forces out that was the whole reason he wanted to go there to begin with.....
The whole war has been nothing but a jumbled mess.
If Ike had managed a war the same way we'd all be speaking German, Italian, or Japanese today.
Then again, we might also be drinking Sake and German beer and eating pasta and sushi. So maybe it wouldn't be that bad!
TaylorHicksRocks
10-11-2007, 01:18 PM
If Ike had managed a war the same way we'd all be speaking German, Italian, or Japanese today.
Then again, we might also be drinking Sake and German beer and eating pasta and sushi. So maybe it wouldn't be that bad!
Lol!!!!!! Things will get better as my husband used to say "And This Too Shall Pass"...
If Ike had managed a war the same way we'd all be speaking German, Italian, or Japanese today.
Then again, we might also be drinking Sake and German beer and eating pasta and sushi. So maybe it wouldn't be that bad!
How about an italian meatball sub sandwich with sauerkraut and doused with duck sauce?
TaylorHicksRocks
10-11-2007, 01:43 PM
How about an italian meatball sub sandwich with sauerkraut and doused with duck sauce?
O dear that sounded good until I got to sauerkraut....I like a good ruben with corned beef sauerkraut and swiss cheese...
How about an italian meatball sub sandwich with sauerkraut and doused with duck sauce?
Add a good German dark wheat beer, and you have an 'explosive' combination.........:fart:
TaylorHicksRocks
10-11-2007, 03:12 PM
Add a good German dark wheat beer, and you have an 'explosive' combination.........:fart:
Oh my my........
sandy
10-11-2007, 08:02 PM
Upset religious fanatics should have been one of the factors to be considered. The closeness in area to all those muslim countries should have been analyzed and their allegiance to islam and the fact that they will kill for their religion should have carefully considered and weighed.
I think the war has given the muslims leaders more fuel to get their followers to kill for them.
That was considered VERY thoroughly, extensively, and with/by the best advisors in the world. NO ONE could have EVER predicted the numbers of muslimes that crawled out from under their burkas to fight against America.
The war hasn't given evil muslimes more fuel. They and their leaders know liberals in the USA are on their side. THAT gives them more "fuel" than you can possibly begin to fathom. :(
That was considered VERY thoroughly, extensively, and with/by the best advisors in the world. NO ONE could have EVER predicted the numbers of muslimes that crawled out from under their burkas to fight against America.
The war hasn't given evil muslimes more fuel. They and their leaders know liberals in the USA are on their side. THAT gives them more "fuel" than you can possibly begin to fathom. :(
I find it hard to believe that with all the information the military had on that particular area in the world that this terrorist backlish would not happen.
I consider this to be a vanity war for bush and to be able to brag to his father that he got saddam. The whole thing could have been handled so much better.
sandy
10-11-2007, 09:10 PM
How?:confused:
RushDog
10-11-2007, 09:14 PM
The hostages were freed after Carter officially left. I disagree with THR. Carter had very little in the hostage return.
Well, there was that botched rescue attempt, that really provided a spark.
President elect Reagan promised Iran military action was headed their way as soon as he was in the Oval Office. Iran believed Reagan, and released the hostages. Iran new Jimmy possessed no backbone.
They knew not to mess with Reagan. Reagan told them what he would do to them, and he meant it.
sandy
10-11-2007, 09:19 PM
Hey- you guys forgot about Clinton. Remember he hit an aspirin factory in the middle of the nite when no one was there in retailiation for a MAJOR hit against us. :confused:...POS...:mad:
RushDog
10-11-2007, 09:22 PM
Hey- you guys forgot about Clinton. Remember he hit an aspirin factory in the middle of the nite when no one was there in retailiation for a MAJOR hit against us. :confused:...POS...:mad:
Then there was that Somalia thing, where we got our ass kicked by some rag-tag army because he and Les Aspin decided not to provide the troops with the proper support and equipment.
"Yeah, lets just go in there with some helicopters. That's the ticket!"
sandy
10-11-2007, 09:28 PM
He always considers terrorism a law enforcement issue. :confused:
God help us if his pathetic lesbo/menopausal/evil/criminal wife is elected. :eek:
RushDog
10-11-2007, 09:28 PM
This one literally made me LOL. :rolleyes: The worst POTUS in history is calling a brilliant man a disaster. :confused: The first real terrorist-enabler is saying Cheney is bad? :(
If he's not aiding and abetting our enemies, he's mocking our leaders. How DARE he insult Bush too--especially after the bang-up job he did as POTUS. Not.
Carter needs to just shut the hell up, go back to GA, and crawl back under his rock. No one cares about what he has to say.
He made a mockery of the White House by caving in to terrorists in '79. We haven't forgotten.
I don't care if he is a nice Christian man. He is an embarrassment to the USA.
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN1026419120071010?feedType=RSS&feedName=politicsNews&rpc=22&sp=true
Back on topic.
Carter was a terrible president, and a traitor as an ex-president. What is it about evil dictators that attracts ol' Jimmah to them?
http://www.therazor.org/oldroot/Fall02/JimmysPrize.htm
RushDog
10-11-2007, 09:30 PM
He always considers terrorism a law enforcement issue. :confused:
God help us if his pathetic lesbo/menopausal/evil/criminal wife is elected. :eek:
Well, with her mood swings, I'm scared to find out what kind of Commander In Chief she'll be.
sandy
10-11-2007, 09:49 PM
Back on topic.
Carter was a terrible president, and a traitor as an ex-president. What is it about evil dictators that attracts ol' Jimmah to them?
http://www.therazor.org/oldroot/Fall02/JimmysPrize.htm
They all hate America. :(
On 911: Jimmy Carter got the whole thing started, Bill Clinton let it build, build, build, build, build. He wouldn't deal with it, because he had no credibility on deploying the military. He was a pot smoking draft dodger, and so when he was presented with credible evidence that this or that country was behind a terrorist attack, he’d just have to look the other way: “No, don't let me hear that. Call in Monica!” -AC
Carter is a sanctimonious phony/disaster during his four years in the White House/disgrace in the quarter of a century since. How the hell can he pass himself off as equal parts statesman/saint? Most of us wish he would simply slink back to his peanut farm. He's just starved for the spotlight. :(
Remember his treasonous/traitor book? :throwup:
sandy
10-11-2007, 09:55 PM
From Ann Coulter's new book. About Jimmy Carter: "Here's a foolproof method for keeping America safe. Always do the exact 180-degree opposite of whatever Jimmy Carter says as quickly as possible." -AC :D
Then there was that Somalia thing, where we got our ass kicked by some rag-tag army because he and Les Aspin decided not to provide the troops with the proper support and equipment.
"Yeah, lets just go in there with some helicopters. That's the ticket!"
Yeah, the White House told them to go into the heart of the Somali rebel stronghold with NO armor support. Now why was the White House selecting equipment manifests for tactical field operations? That should have been done by the military.
But the US military didn't exactly get their azzes kicked. The kill ration was at least 200 to 1. Possibly as high as 1,000 to 1. We lost a small number of troops but the rebels possibly lost as many as 10,000.
AngelBaby
10-12-2007, 03:58 PM
Mr. Carter should go with the Mr. Romney to the dentists to make his teeth not brown anymore for to look nicer for him
sandy
10-12-2007, 08:16 PM
Well, with her mood swings, I'm scared to find out what kind of Commander In Chief she'll be.
It's not only mood swings, she's a complete and total nutjob. She flipflops on issues worse than Kerry. She is a chameleon saying whatever you want to hear. She is menopausal and THAT'S enough to keep her out of the White House. Menopausal women are freakin' scary. :eek:
She has connections to criminal activity dating back 30 years. She is not a Christian because Christians do NOT support baby-killing/homosexuality/ sodomy/etc...
She is not qualified to be POTUS. And the LAST thing we need back in the White House is her pathetic alley cat-in-heat/rapist/slut husband. :mad:
RushDog
10-12-2007, 08:19 PM
her pathetic alley cat-in-heat/rapist/slut husband. :mad:
Somebody told me the other day that a hard penis has no conscience. Whatever that means.
sandy
10-12-2007, 08:38 PM
Yeah, but does it have a compass? :confused:
AngelBaby
10-14-2007, 02:18 PM
For the Carter is the more disaster than the Cheney?
sandy
10-14-2007, 07:34 PM
Yes, the Carter is MUCH more the disaster. :) Cheney is awesome, smart, funny, and nice. I like him. Carter, not so much.
AngelBaby
10-15-2007, 03:16 PM
For me the Mr. CHeney is the handsome man with the handsome face. For even with the not so much hairs he is still the handsome and very very smart for the United States of America