PDA

View Full Version : TO Bowl this weekend


aztecgoods
10-04-2006, 08:52 AM
Well TO is back in Philly this weekend, possibly starting a riot. How does everyone think the game will go down? Both teams humiliated 2 sorry teams this past week, Packs and Titans, both suck, but both Philly and the Cowgirls looked good. I think the Cowgirls are looking better and should win, but anything could happen on any given....... What do ya'll think?

RushDog
10-04-2006, 08:56 AM
I don't know how T.O. will do, but I know McNabb will probably have a good game. He's been on fire this year. He's leading in yards passing. He seems alot happier and relaxed without T.O around.

AbsentElement
10-04-2006, 09:09 AM
I don't know how T.O. will do, but I know McNabb will probably have a good game. He's been on fire this year. He's leading in yards passing. He seems alot happier and relaxed without T.O around.

I'm sure there will be plenty of people throwing things at T.O., like pill bottles & such (but are they smart enough to take their name and address labels off first?). There will probably be some players doing a little extra pushing and shoving in the first few minutes. After about 5 minutes come off the clock, everyone will settle into a football game.

No doubt this will be one of the best games to watch this weekend. Personally, I don't care if Philly shuts down T.O., as long as their coverage of him opens up opportunities for Jones, Glenn, and Witten. But I think the Eagles are much smarter than that.

The only way the Cowboys really have a shot at actually winning this one though, is to win in time of possession. They have to keep the ball away from McNabb.

aztecgoods
10-04-2006, 09:10 AM
So you not taking a stand on how the game will go down? I think it will be cowgirls 28 to 24.

AbsentElement
10-04-2006, 09:15 AM
I never like to bet against my own favorite team. I think the Cowboys can win it, but I don't think they will, at least not in Philly. They may beat Philly in Dallas on Christmas Day, but I don't think they'll pull this one off. Philly's one of the worst places to play as a (divisional rival) visitor. I'd have to say this ones gonna go more like 31-14, Philly's way.

RushDog
10-04-2006, 09:21 AM
I think it's going to be a shootout.

TaylorHicksRocks
10-04-2006, 09:42 AM
I never like to bet against my own favorite team. I think the Cowboys can win it, but I don't think they will, at least not in Philly. They may beat Philly in Dallas on Christmas Day, but I don't think they'll pull this one off. Philly's one of the worst places to play as a (divisional rival) visitor. I'd have to say this ones gonna go more like 31-14, Philly's way.

So true however TO may just do an awesome job and pull off a win, keeping fingers crossed! Either way it will be a good game. I have been a Cowboy fan since Roger Staback (sp?) Drew Hill and Ed Too Tall Jones were playing those were the days!:)

aztecgoods
10-04-2006, 09:43 AM
They're probably more equally matched than they have been in a long time so I really think its a toss up, any given sunday kinda thing really applies here. Whoever brings it the hardest is going to win. I thought the EAglets looked like crap in the first half on Monday, but obviously came back strong in the 2nd half. Whoever plays the hardest for the full 60 minutes will win.

I'm going to go out on a limb and change my initial pick. I think it will be a cowgirl blowout after thinking about how the eaglets looked in the first half against the packers. And considering it seems like it is usually a blow out one way or another between them. I say its going to be 35 to 14 Cowgirls. I am just betting that the Eaglets will look like they did in the first half against the packers and the cowgirls will be at the top of their game since they have been under the media microscope lately giving them so extra motivation.

TO if anything makes the best decoy in the world to free it up for everyone else. But I'm sure most teams won't fall for that. Especially the Eaglets.

RushDog
10-04-2006, 09:52 AM
They're probably more equally matched than they have been in a long time so I really think its a toss up, any given sunday kinda thing really applies here. Whoever brings it the hardest is going to win. I thought the EAglets looked like crap in the first half on Monday, but obviously came back strong in the 2nd half. Whoever plays the hardest for the full 60 minutes will win.

I'm going to go out on a limb and change my initial pick. I think it will be a cowgirl blowout after thinking about how the eaglets looked in the first half against the packers. And considering it seems like it is usually a blow out one way or another between them. I say its going to be 35 to 14 Cowgirls. I am just betting that the Eaglets will look like they did in the first half against the packers and the cowgirls will be at the top of their game since they have been under the media microscope lately giving them so extra motivation.

TO if anything makes the best decoy in the world to free it up for everyone else. But I'm sure most teams won't fall for that. Especially the Eaglets.

Alot of it depends on how Bledsoe does. He might get nailed a few times back in the pocket. I haven't been overly impressed with him this year. He did good against the Titans. But, then again, those were the Titans.

aztecgoods
10-04-2006, 09:57 AM
He did good against the skins too. I wish they had that lightweight schedule the bears have. They have a lighter than usual schedule for theirs is usually the toughest in the league, but its not as bad this year. Mainly just their division and the Colts. But thats a big change for them. Usually they have their division which is usually the toughest in the league and then a bunch of other real good teams like in the past, 49ers, Packers, etc., but its changed this year, not only do they not play those teams this year but they suck this year anyway. This would have been a good year to leave those teams on their schedule.

RushDog
10-04-2006, 10:02 AM
The Bears have a really good schedule. I think our toughest team is the Pats. I just wish we played the Panthers again. I'd really like to see the Bears hurt somebody. Especially a certain little wide receiver. Since the playoffs last year, the Panthers become my most hated team next to the Packers and Vikings.

TaylorHicksRocks
10-04-2006, 10:03 AM
He did good against the skins too. I wish they had that lightweight schedule the bears have. They have a lighter than usual schedule for theirs is usually the toughest in the league, but its not as bad this year. Mainly just their division and the Colts. But thats a big change for them. Usually they have their division which is usually the toughest in the league and then a bunch of other real good teams like in the past, 49ers, Packers, etc., but its changed this year, not only do they not play those teams this year but they suck this year anyway. This would have been a good year to leave those teams on their schedule.

Well now you have gone and and lost me.........:confused:

RushDog
10-04-2006, 10:10 AM
Well now you have gone and and lost me.........:confused:

Yeah! Weren't you talking about Roger Staubach and Too Tall Jones, or something?

aztecgoods
10-04-2006, 10:11 AM
Because the 49ers and the Packers stink this year. The bears schedule is so pansy heavy they are as good as in the playoffs with home field advantage.

RushDog
10-04-2006, 10:14 AM
Because the 49ers and the Packers stink this year. The bears schedule is so pansy heavy they are as good as in the playoffs with home field advantage.

It also helps when you're in the NFC North. You get to play the Packers and Lions twice. That's four wins easy. That's okay, I like to whoop on them
49ers too. Makes up for all them times when Montana and Young used to kill us. That's another team that I'm glad that totally sucks now.

TaylorHicksRocks
10-04-2006, 10:20 AM
It also helps when you're in the NFC North. You get to play the Packers and Lions twice. That's four wins easy. That's okay, I like to whoop on them
49ers too. Makes up for all them times when Montana and Young used to kill us. That's another team that I'm glad that totally sucks now.

Now your talking!!!!:luxhello:

aztecgoods
10-04-2006, 10:22 AM
It also helps when you're in the NFC North. You get to play the Packers and Lions twice. That's four wins easy. That's okay, I like to whoop on them
49ers too. Makes up for all them times when Montana and Young used to kill us. That's another team that I'm glad that totally sucks now.

Yeah thats what I'm saying, the cowgirls have to play Philly, Skins and the Giants 2 a year. And even the Skins are looking like they're back, so its typically the toughest schedule in the league. This year most of their out of division games are light weights, which is a drastic change. They should make it as long as they beat their division rivals. But thats kinda like saying you can get to the moon as long as you can build a Saturn V rocket.

Son of Simon
10-04-2006, 11:25 AM
For me it boils down to injuries for Philly and who is available.

Without Westbrook, Philly's ground game looks shaky and unpredictable. McNabb had better rushing numbers than his backs at the start of the 3rd quarter. Westbrook provides legitimate problems for defenses, and could really chew up Dallas's inconsistenencies defending the screen pass.

Philly will have some problems containing TO in 1-1 situations. Our secondary has some good speed, but I wouldn't rely on the whole unit to come through on open field tackling. Trotter and our backs will make sure that Dallas' run game will be compromised. Also- don't forget Dante Stallworth, who should be looking to a prove a point just as much as McNabb.

I don't see the game as a shootout- it will boil down to time of possession like AE says and defense, with some breakout plays by the star players we've named. Without Westbrook- I believe Philly will lose a close game.

TaylorHicksRocks
10-04-2006, 11:46 AM
For me it boils down to injuries for Philly and who is available.

Without Westbrook, Philly's ground game looks shaky and unpredictable. McNabb had better rushing numbers than his backs at the start of the 3rd quarter. Westbrook provides legitimate problems for defenses, and could really chew up Dallas's inconsistenencies defending the screen pass.

Philly will have some problems containing TO in 1-1 situations. Our secondary has some good speed, but I wouldn't rely on the whole unit to come through on open field tackling. Trotter and our backs will make sure that Dallas' run game will be compromised. Also- don't forget Dante Stallworth, who should be looking to a prove a point just as much as McNabb.

I don't see the game as a shootout- it will boil down to time of possession like AE says and defense, with some breakout plays by the star players we've named. Without Westbrook- I believe Philly will lose a close game.


No matter what it will be a good game......I remember a time when the Cowboys were 1 and 15 they played the Eagles and the Eagles really knocked the Boys around. So they have a rivalary. The game will be a good one!!:boldblue: Go Cowboys!!!!

MusicLover
10-04-2006, 01:27 PM
I just wish we played the Panthers again. I'd really like to see the Bears hurt somebody. Especially a certain little wide receiver. Since the playoffs last year, the Panthers become my most hated team

Bring it on, Chicago! Hey, maybe the Panthers can kick their butts in the Superbowl this year... Oh, wait, the Bears won't make it to the Superbowl. I forgot. :D

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j287/scbeauty1983/steve_smith.jpg http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j287/scbeauty1983/smith-steve_action.jpg

TaylorHicksRocks
10-04-2006, 01:44 PM
Bring it on, Chicago! Hey, maybe the Panthers can kick their butts in the Superbowl this year... Oh, wait, the Bears won't make it to the Superbowl. I forgot. :D

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j287/scbeauty1983/steve_smith.jpg http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j287/scbeauty1983/smith-steve_action.jpg

Okay Chicago is 4 and 0 why won't they go to the superbowl?

MusicLover
10-04-2006, 01:45 PM
It's early in the season... You never know. There's plenty more season left to go. I'm really just picking, though. The Bears are lookin' good so far. You just always pull for your team. ;)

TaylorHicksRocks
10-04-2006, 01:47 PM
It's early in the season... You never know. There's plenty more season left to go.

Yeah you never know........

AbsentElement
10-04-2006, 11:30 PM
For me it boils down to injuries for Philly and who is available.

Without Westbrook, Philly's ground game looks shaky and unpredictable. McNabb had better rushing numbers than his backs at the start of the 3rd quarter. Westbrook provides legitimate problems for defenses, and could really chew up Dallas's inconsistenencies defending the screen pass.

Philly will have some problems containing TO in 1-1 situations. Our secondary has some good speed, but I wouldn't rely on the whole unit to come through on open field tackling. Trotter and our backs will make sure that Dallas' run game will be compromised. Also- don't forget Dante Stallworth, who should be looking to a prove a point just as much as McNabb.

I don't see the game as a shootout- it will boil down to time of possession like AE says and defense, with some breakout plays by the star players we've named. Without Westbrook- I believe Philly will lose a close game.

I think Stallworth's hurt too... his hammy, I think. I haven't checked today though, maybe he practiced.

aztecgoods
10-05-2006, 08:21 AM
The cowgirls are pretty healthy right now. They should be able to pull it out with Philly at such a disadvantage, I've heard that their defensive secondary is all beat up too. So maybe TO and Terry will run rampant.

TaylorHicksRocks
10-05-2006, 08:37 AM
The cowgirls are pretty healthy right now. They should be able to pull it out with Philly at such a disadvantage, I've heard that their defensive secondary is all beat up too. So maybe TO and Terry will run rampant.

I can only hope. You know the entire time I lived in Nevada I never bet on the Cowboys.....because if I bet on them to win they lost and would never bet on them to lose even when they were 1 and 15.....

RushDog
10-05-2006, 08:44 AM
I just hope the G-men get back on track. I have a few of their guys on my fantasy teams. Maybe Shockey raising a little hell might provide a spark.

TaylorHicksRocks
10-05-2006, 08:49 AM
I just hope the G-men get back on track. I have a few of their guys on my fantasy teams. Maybe Shockey raising a little hell might provide a spark.

Who are the G-men?

RushDog
10-05-2006, 09:05 AM
Who are the G-men?

New York Giants

TaylorHicksRocks
10-05-2006, 09:19 AM
New York Giants

Oh okay I didn't think it was the Eagles or The Cowboys. Thank you for clarifing.:)

TaylorHicksRocks
10-08-2006, 06:07 PM
T.O should have stayed home!!!!:outtahere